Wednesday, March 19, 2008

1/3 Off the Top...


Amador.WhoBoughtWhat.com is reporting on a recent sale down in the lovely little town of Ione. The home at 3530 Lakeview Dr. just sold for the whopping price of $205k.

This home is a roomy 3 bedroom, 2 bath, with 1355 square feet on a 1/4 acre no less. And take a look at the size of that driveway! You can park several buses on that slab; and believe me Ione has a couple to spare.

At that price, it works about to be $151 per square foot. Man, that is almost affordable.

Traditional calculations still put this home in the hands of a household with a gross income of about $71k, which doesn't cover too many of the jobs in this area outside of working at the prison across the street. But, we're getting ever-so slowly closer to reality.

The previous owners didn't quite make it before the government started coming up with all this bail-out legislation and other programs. Just missed! It looks like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are going to be able to buy all of that cruddy and worthless MBS paper real soon though. Then the taxpayers will easily be able to afford picking up these losses; I say, share the wealth and spread the pain, eh? In fact, let's just add to what our grandchildren already owe on our reckless spending. No sense in someone hogging all that suffering to themselves (tongue is in cheek).

Anyway, the previous owners had picked up this gem for $309k back in April of '05 - back when gold was floating in the river apparently. I guess they hated to continue to pay for something that was getting cheaper every 24 hours, so....

1/3 off the top! Not bad. Still, I think that the new owners will discover in another year that the comps will be even less than what they paid. Maybe they can pawn it off to the OFHEO, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or the like in the very near future.

Again?


Shocking but true. The property at 17780 W Clinton Road in Jackson, CA is once again facing foreclosure. This place was highlighted in March of 2007 in the article "More Trustee Sales" as on the doomsday list and incredibly, here it is again.

NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S SALE TS No. 06-28190
DEED OF TRUST, DATED 08/18/2005
Will sell on 04/08/2008 at 12:00PM
Notice of Sale is $452,952.05

Oddly enough, there is more owed now than back in March of '07 ($452k vs. $414k). Perhaps, this is one of those reverse mortgages. It seems a lot of people have those these days. :)>

Back in the day (Mar. of '07), it was being marketed at $619k. Today, there are 2 interesting offerings:
  1. Barbi Boyle has it listed at $599k (it says "reduced", um...)
  2. Village Real Estate has it at $395k - wow, that looks like $200k less than Barbi! Barbi, you need to dump Ken, sell the pink corvette, and get with the times. It does currently say "pending", but we'll see. It seems I have heard that story before. Can someone say "short sale"?
Well, good luck and stay renting.

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

Assessing Value...

Jim Rooney, Assessor

Mission: "Our mission is to create equitable, timely and accurate property tax assessments to fund public services. We will strive to be a source of accurate and timely property information for local government and the community."

Link to the Assessor's Website

Phone: (209) 223-6351
Assessor's Email

For those that have already felt the sting of depreciation, there may be some relief on the horizon. The Amador County Assessor's office is reporting that property taxes may be lowered because of property value declines.

The Amador Ledger Dispatch reports in Reassessing your property values:

With a decrease of property values over the past year or so, the Amador County Assessor's Office is in the process of reviewing and reducing some assessments throughout the county and we are also receiving numerous inquiries about the reduction of assessments.
The key word here is "some". It is not likely in the county's best interest to have mass reductions in assessments being that they receive a large portion of yearly revenue from property taxes.
However, we are obligated to reduce assessments when the assessed value of a property is greater than fair market value.
The issue then is to provide evidence that your property has in fact lost value since your purchase. My suggestion would be to do all that you can to assist in this process. Hire your own appraiser and push the Assessor's Office to examine the results.

A family member of mine that lives down in the Stockton area has lost a bit of value in her home. She asked for the county to reduce the assessment based on the market conditions. Their response was that there were no reliable comps in the area to support her claim. She responded that there have been multiple foreclosures and that there are comps from FC purchases and bank buy-backs. Their reply was that foreclosures do not count toward comp values.

Amazing that FCs seem to affect everything else prompting so much government action to help and bail out the banks, but they don't affect your tax rate. Maybe if you worked for Citi Bank, MBIA, or AMBAC you could get a break.

Expect the Assessor's Office to drag their feet on this, but keep pushing.
Assessment review requests may be submitted to the assessor's office at any time. Requests for assessment review that are received between July 2 and Nov. 30 will be reviewed for the current tax year. Requests received between Nov. 30 and June 30 may be examined for the next tax year.
Like with most things in the government, these time frames make no common sense. Strange how there is a 5 month window in the middle of the year that is applicable to the current tax year, but there is a 7 month window (including the first 6 months) that is applicable to the next tax year. Does that make sense?

In any case, the best advice is to keep pushing and make a lot of noise. Be the squeaky wheel and demand that grease!

So, give Jim Rooney a call and let him know that you also support "equitable, timely and accurate property tax assessments".

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

A New Record...

Wow! A new record I believe. The Amador Ledger-Dispatch currently has 16 Trustee Sale Announcements.

Here they are:
Address, Notice of Sale, Date of Sale
1. 11656 New York Ranch Road Jackson CA $747,339.77 03/18/08
2. 14661 Shenandoah Road Plymouth CA 95669 $440,155.01 03/18/08
3. 18900 Jura Lane Fiddletown CA 95629 $80,629.16 03/18/08
4. 340 South Ave., Jackson, CA $203,802.98 3/27/08
5. 18892 Ellinwood Way , Jackson, CA $369,119.89 03/25/08
6. 3570 Lakeview Drive Ione, CA 95640 $261,779.30 03/27/08
7. 4235 LAKEVIEW DRIVE, Lone, CA 95640 $278,517.32 04/02/08
8. 829 PICCARDO LN , JACKSON, CA. 95642 $245,839.40 04/01/08
9. 10336 AMADOR ST. JACKSON, CA 95642 $217,290.80 04/02/08
10. 16437 Meadow Vista Dr. Pioneer, CA 95666 $363,819.04 3/18/2008
11. 5674 Red Oak Drive, Ione, CA, 95640 $94,196.75 03/18/2008
12. 445 Preston Ave. Ione, CA 95640 $300,288.64 3/25/2008
13. 263 Columbia Way, Sutter Creek, CA 95685 $319,995.78 03/13/2008
14. 1103 OAK VIEW DR IONE, CA 95640 $515,304.24 4/1/2008
15. 14661 Shenandoah Road Plymouth CA 95669 $440,155.01 03/18/08
16. 2727 Curran Road Ione, CA 95640 $300,749.23 3/24/2008

New Taxes on Gas...


One place you are not likely to hear any complaining regarding gas prices is the California legislature and the Governor's office. "Why", you may ask. Well, because with every increase of the per gallon price, there is a correlating increase in tax revenue.

In a recent conversation with the all knowing oracle of trivial information (an unnamed uncle of mine), he related how there is also a sales tax per dollar above and beyond the excise taxes which are on each gallon. This I did not know. In California, there is an 18 cent per gallon state excise tax, another 18.4 cent Federal excise tax, the sales tax, and some other 1 cent federal deal.

So, with an increase in gas prices, California actually adds to the coffers with the new jackpot of gasoline taxes with the typical 7.25% per dollar sales tax.

Now, Assembly Democrats are rushing to fill the endless abyss in its appetite for spending by creating a bill to increase taxes on the one thing that is a necessity for most - oil and gas. Yes, we are in a huge budget crisis in California, thousands losing their homes, prices for everything are going up, teachers are getting laid off...I know, we can solve the whole thing with...(triumphant horns blaring)...NEW OIL TAXES.

Yes, that is right boys and girls. You have not felt enough pain. Forget the gross mismanagement of funds and revenue - you are not paying enough. Is this one of those Bustamante "tough love" scenarios?

Unbelievable!

Capitol Weekly reports:
The bill would create a new 2 percent oil tax for any oil company that earns more than $10 million in net income. It would also impose a new 6 percent “oil severance tax” based on the gross value of each barrel of oil produced in the state.

DeVore said the proposal would "devastate oil production in California if it’s passed," and would lead to an increase in Calfornia's gas prices, despite language in the bill that specifically prohibits oil companies from passing the cost of the new tax on to consumers.

The bill language was introduced Monday, and is being fast-tracked by the Speaker’s office. It is scheduled to be heard in Assembly Revenue and Taxation Wednesday, and on the Assembly floor some time this week, right before the Legislature adjourns for spring break.
Yeah, no doubt it is being "fast-tracked". Get it in under the radar as fast as possible. Have these people been hanging out on New York Ranch Road?

It is like I always say, "Anybody that thinks that corporations pay taxes is a moron." And I say that without reservation.

Corporations do not pay taxes - people pay taxes. I know it is a new paradigm, but try to align your brain cells for a minute. If a tax is levied on a company or an industry and it is in that company's best interest to make a profit instead of going under and filing for bankruptcy, the company reprices their product to reflect the cost of doing business. It is that simple.

If a company does not make profit, then a company dies. Nobody, except the Federal government, would be willing to invest in a company that cannot make a profit. There is no incentive and no reason.

So, if the law states that the company cannot pass on the new taxes, what do you think will happen to that new company? Hmmmm....I know. Perhaps, they will substantially reduce their production to meet profit goals, or...they will leave the state.

Some may shout "Good! We don't want those slimy oil companies here anyway." Well, you are a moron or you have a political agenda that is far left of the ACLU. If you think the cost of goods is high now, wait until oil production and all by-products (gasoline, HELLO!) have to be shipped here rather than produced here. Won't that be a dream come true.

All comments will be read with an open mind...of course.

Busted, Again...


As a follow up to the article, What the Hey?, ratlab has sent an interesting piece by the Amador Ledger Dispatch - Another pot bust. It appears that the property at 11656 New York Ranch Road in Jackson may be the same one highlighted in a rather large and industrious Cannabis agricultural project. I am sure it was strictly medicinal.

Well, I guess they went from one bust to another. I'm not sure what they were smoking at the time of the purchase or at the time of the first bust, but they may want to engage in their business product line to ease the pain on this second bust. Perhaps they thought the appreciation on their home would continue to get higher. Hey, I got a million of 'em...really, I'll be here all week...no, seriously.

If anyone has any additional information on this, please let us know.

Wednesday, March 5, 2008

What the Hey?


Another amazing colossal failure of a real estate purchase.

I continually shake my head in disgust and absolute amazement at what is being revealed by all of this - greed, greed, greed...ignorance...I don't know. I guess I'm just a bitter renter (with no debt - ha!)

Another T.S. notice filed on 02/27/08 in the Amador Ledger-Dispatch.
  • NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S SALE T.S No. 1120311-04
  • 11656 New York Ranch Road Jackson CA 95642
  • Deed of Trust recorded May 25, 2007
  • Notice of Sale is: $747,339.77
What in the world? 9 months and it is now being scheduled for auction?!!! Truly incredible. Is that a record?

WhoBoughtWhat has the last sale recorded as $940k. Apparently, the only ones that profited on this were the sellers and the real estate agents. That is a heck of a commission - at 6% that is just about $56k. Wow! Good work if you can get it.

But, wouldn't you know it, NexTag has the value currently at $893k, which, as they say is -$47k "appreciation". I'm sorry, wouldn't that be depreciation? Whatever. Of course, that was as of 12/23/07, so it might have changed a bit since then. Uh...lower, I believe.

Now, check this out. Currently, it appears that the home is for sale (imagine that) for $899k through Sondra Ammons.

However, according to this link, Sondra already sold this once before: Sold for $940k. Will she double dip? Like I said, great work if you can get it.

But, I am not sure if this is an old link or what. It could be...and we don't want to cast any disparaging judgments toward somebody if we don't have all of the facts. So, for now, I will say that this is probably an old link.

Regardless, if you want the real deal (right) you need to get a hold of Thomas Blackman. He's got it listed at $799k.

Will the real steal/deal place stand up?

Drowning in Plymouth...


Here is an interesting home currently on the market. The Amador Ledger-Dispatch has a Notice of Default filed on 2/27 with the following information:
  • NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S SALE T.S No. 1119221-04
  • Date of Sale: 03/18/2008
  • 14661 Shenandoah Road Plymouth CA 95669
  • Notice of Sale is: $440,155.01
Interestingly, the now much-relied-upon Amador.WhoBoughtWhat .Com (thanks guys) shows this property last sold on 3/11/2005 to James & Deborah Ferguson for $310,500. This was confirmed by NexTag as well.

Currently, NexTag has the estimated value for this home at $355k.

Notice the difference between what is listed as the "Notice of Sale", which is approximately what is owed on the property (the UPB - unpaid principal balance) plus some estimated fees, and what the Fergusons actually paid for the home.

$355k vs. $440k - hello! Can someone say "refi with cash back"? How about the word "underwater"?

Laughably, the home is currently for sale at $489k through Kappel and Kappel. Good luck with that.
14661 SHENANDOAH Rd
Plymouth, CA, 95669 County: Amador
Bd: 3 Ba: 1 1314 sqft.
MLS#: 60119124 Status: W
Price: $489,000

There does seem to be some discrepancy on the number of bedrooms. Kappel and Kappel have it recorded as a 3/1, while NexTag and WhoBoughtWhat have it down as a 2/1.

So, would this person qualify for a Bernanke sponsored suggestion for the lender to reduce the principal amount to match what is fair market value? How and who would analyze each of the millions of these types of situations? If the lender didn't do the due diligence when they gave the loan to begin with, what makes you think that they will provide the due diligence to the FHA, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac when they try and hock this loan?

Clearly, a person that took out equity from their homes when values were soaring and now find themselves upside down and underwater should not be propped up by any government sponsored legislation or strong "suggestions" to the Mortgage Banker's Association. The government needs to stay out of this! The lenders need to take their lumps, the borrowers need to feel the pain, and the market will absorb the downside appropriately.

Why we as a society want to sponsor and advocate reckless behavior at taxpayers expense is beyond me.